Morality of Abortion Essay

Introduction In this paper, I get out argue that abortion is virtuously pleasant in certain propertys. In defending this rivalry I will include the reason crapper my decision, and I will provide an alternate standard using the same worldwide principle. aft(prenominal) explaining my principle I will utilise clarity to twain arguments that whitethorn be presented by others. Finally, I will adjudicate by describing any changes that I catch made to my general principle. II. Argument 1.)If a somebody is in a billet in which she bear prevent an several(prenominal) from accompaniment a brio of anguish and excruciation, so it is virtuously refreshing for her to do so. 2. ) In cases in which a pose is in a occurrence in which she bum prevent her unhatched electric razor from living a sustenance of annoying and paroxysm, by having an abortion 3. ) Therefore, in this cases it is chastely unimp distri exactlyivelyable for a mother to submit an abortion. III. Exp lanation Rule mavin states an argument is good for you if and only if all of the exposit be reasonable for you to conceptualise. For this rule I will use a standardised occurrence with the same general principle. If Allison is a situation in which her favorite track severely breaks his leg and back tooth non be repaired, so it is morally acceptable for her to euthanize the dog. In this example it is morally acceptable to euthanize the dog because the dog will non be able to walk once again and will suffer because it will non be able to move. Therefore, if a person is in a situation in which she can prevent an individual from living a life of annoying and suffering, because it is morally acceptable for her to do so.The cooperate and third premise state that (1) In a case where a mother is in a situation in which she can prevent her un born(p) boor from living a life of pain and suffering, by having an abortion (2) Therefore, it is morally acceptable for a mother t o have an abortion. In explaining my argument I will springiness an example that supports the second and third premise. If a mother is in a situation in which she becomes aware that her unborn child has an extremely painful and incurable sickness called Epidermolysis Bullosa, EB. This disease causes skin to blister on the slightest touch.many infants that are born with this disease are are con? ned to eating away bandages at all times and can not even with stand their ingest parents touching them. In this case hence it is ok for that mother to have an abortion. This execution is ok because if the child is born with a disease that is incurable and painful then that child will be in will suffer for their whole lifetime and in many cases live a very pithy life. Therefore if a mother is in a situation in which she is able to prevent her unborn child from living a life of pain and suffering then it is morally acceptable for her to have an abortion.Rule two states that the argument must have a pattern much(prenominal) that if the exposit are lawful, then the conclusion must follow. 1. ) If P, then Q 2. ) P 3. ) Therefore, Q 1. ) If P (a person is in a situation in which she can prevent an individual from living a life of pain and suffering), then Q (it is morally acceptable for her to do so. ) 2. ) P (In a case where a mother is in a situation in which she can prevent her unborn child from living a life of pain and suffering, by having an abortion), 3.)Therefore, Q (in some cases it is morally acceptable for a mother to have an abortion. ) IV. Objection An dissent that may arise from premise one is that if a person is in a situation in which they sacri? ce their avow life to prevent pain and suffering of another individual, then it is not morally acceptable for them to do so. An example of this is if hammer is in a situation in which he can take the come on of a person in recluse con? nement, which causes psychological pain and suffering, it is not mo rally acceptable for him to do so.It is not morally acceptable because although the individual is suffering they knowingly participated in the act that resulted in the pain and suffering. This example expresses a encroachment of rule two because the argument does not follow a pattern in which the conclusion follows. Another objection that may arise from premise one is if a mother is in a situation in which she can violate the in good order-hand(a) to life of another person, the fetus, and the fetus is not threatening the mothers life, then it is morally damage for the mother to violate the fetus right to life.My response to this argument is that although the mothers life is not in endangerment by having the fetus, after the fetus is born they will live a short and extremely difficult life. This example is a violation of rule two because the premises are not reasonable to believe. V. remnant When thinking closely the situation antecedently stated in the paper, I fantasy about the many options that could be presented when confronted with information, such as the fetus has an incurable and super painful disease.By weighing the pros and cons of each principle I was able to lay down my principle that was stated above. While paper this paper I have changed my general principle by adding the word suffering. By adding this one word I believe that it changes the argument by including another verbal expression that can make a life unbearable. When ? rst thinking about the reasoning behind my paper I thought about all view points that I could take, but I was able to stay true to my original belief of pro-choice by creating an argument that supports one aspect of the abortion debate.